Inside the Case of Parimoo vs. Amin — A Battle Between Power and Principle
By Politico.ca Staff Report | Brampton, Ontario
In a quiet courtroom, a story is unfolding that speaks to something much larger than a single dispute.
The case of Parimoo vs. Amin isn’t just about one complaint — it’s about how truth, privilege, and justice collide inside Ontario’s legal system.
Abu Ubaida Amin, a self-represented business owner from Brampton, says he has faced years of discrimination and procedural abuse following false and malicious accusations made by Dr. Sabina Parimoo. What began as a defamation claim has grown into a broader struggle over truth, fairness, and systemic bias.
Amin insists that the record speaks for itself: police complaints were misleading, evidence was overlooked, and false narratives were accepted without scrutiny. He argues that the system failed to protect the principles it was built upon — transparency, equality, and justice for all, not just for those with money or legal connections.
Meanwhile, Dr. Parimoo’s side continues to deny any wrong doing. But contradictions in filings and testimony have left serious doubts about who is really telling the truth.
For Amin, this fight has never been just personal — it’s a test of whether the truth can survive inside a system designed to silence the self-represented. His journey is now being watched by many who see in it their own struggle for justice.
“The record will prove it,” Amin says. “Only one side is telling the truth.”
⸻
[…] Only One Side Is Telling the Truth […]